New Bill To Overhaul Food Safety Laws

The U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate approved a bill that will overhaul the nation’s food safety laws for the first time since the Great Depression.

President Obama has indicated that he plans to sign the bill into law.

Debra Strauss, J.D., associate professor of business law at Fairfield University, explained that the legislation establishes a food tracing system through which consumers can be rapidly identified and deaths and illnesses minimized in the event of a contamination outbreak. It will allow the FDA to require importers to certify the safety of their foods before entering the U.S. food supply.

The new measure is about prevention of illness and places the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a proactive position. It gives the U.S. government far-reaching authority to establish food safety standards for farmers and food processors, and gives the FDA the authority to recall food. The current food safety policy depends on government inspectors discovering contamination. Also, in outbreaks of contamination, the FDA has in the past had to count on food companies to voluntarily remove their products from stores.

“After a difficult journey, through technical and procedural hurdles, this food safety legislation has now passed, on the way to strengthening the powers of the FDA for inspections and recalling of tainted foods,” said Strauss, a faculty member of the Dolan School of Business. Her research has been pressing for modifications in food law, noting while the law in this area has not been altered, biotechnology has transformed the nature-and arguably the safety-of crops and food products exponentially.

“With bipartisan support from both houses of Congress and the President, this new legislation represents a mandate that food safety is at this moment becoming a priority,” Strauss said. “Accordingly, the time is ripe for a reassessment of other areas of food laws to make meaningful change in the food safety standards regarding biotechnology, particularly genetically modified foods and the use of milk and meat from cloned animals and their progeny.  These areas need particular attention because these foods are entering the U.S. market without labeling and monitoring, unlike our counterparts overseas, resulting in agricultural trade problems and questions for consumers of the safety of the U.S.-and ultimately global-food supply.”

“Prompted by the increased incidents of tainted foods in recent years, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act will strengthen food law by enlarging powers of the FDA to inspect plants and order recalls, powers and abilities it does not currently have, and as such signals a new shift in policy from reactive to proactive,” Strauss commented. “It also increases funding for the FDA, although this component caused difficulties for the Senate version of the bill, temporarily derailing its progress as it was sent back to originate in the House of Representatives, which is the Constitutionally appropriate body to handle monetary appropriations.”

A stronger version of this legislation had passed in the House previously but did not gain approval in the Senate. Even so, the Senate version that is now becoming law contains many constructive components, Strauss noted. “In addition to inspection and recall powers for the FDA, it requires food producers to develop food safety plans, including identifying potential risks of contamination or other hazards, and identifying the mechanisms through which those risks would be controlled,” Strauss said. “The legislation establishes a food tracing system through which consumers can be rapidly identified and deaths and illnesses minimized in the event of a contamination outbreak. Strengthening restrictions on imported foods, the FDA will be empowered to deny entry to foods that do not comply with U.S. food safety requirements or requests for inspections.”

This is the first time in 70 years that food law has been changed significantly. The Senate bill received widespread support from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and trade groups of food producers and grocery stores. Small farmers, meanwhile, opposed this legislation, fearing the increased costs and paperwork of regulation.Concessions were made to accommodate their interests, including exemptions from FDA registration requirements for farms that market more than 50% of their product directly from the farm or from farm stands or farmer’s markets, as well as less costly alternatives to HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Plans) and a competitive grant program for food safety training with priority to small and mid-sized farms, Strauss said.

The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition noted after the grassroots mobilization and much negotiation the bill now provides scale-appropriate food safety rules for small farms and mid-sized farms and local processors that sell to restaurants, food coops, groceries, wholesalers and at farm stands and farmers markets.

“But the new law does not deal with meat safety, which is in the purview of the U.S. Department of Agriculture,” Strauss said. “The scope and powers of the USDA were not addressed in this legislation.”

A former Food and Drug Law Institute Scholar, Strauss’s research on the legal issues associated with the regulation of genetically modified organisms has been published in the Food and Drug Law Journal, The International Lawyer, Journal of Food Law & Policy, Stanford Journal of International Law, Journal of Legal Studies in Business, and American Business Law Journal. A Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Cornell University and Yale Law School, she is a member of the International Law and Ethics Sections of the Academy of Legal Studies in Business, the Connecticut Bar Association, the Federal Bar Council, and the Biotechnology in Agriculture Group of the Yale University Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics.



Speak Your Mind